Technology, Talent and Cooperation: Building a More Adaptive...

A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives: a curated forum reserved for leaders nominated by our subscribers and vetted by our Manufacturing Technology Insights Advisory Board.

American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)

Technology, Talent and Cooperation: Building a More Adaptive Maritime Ecosystem

Patrick Ryan

We often hear that shipping is at an inflection point. At this stage, we might need a new phrase, because shipping always seems to be at an inflection point. Every year becomes the most pivotal yet. But this year does feel different. Over the last several months, a combination of powerful forces has converged.

The pressure to decarbonize and modernize the fleet continues to intensify, but with uncertainty from both technology and regulatory perspectives.

Digital technologies, automation and data analytics are moving from experiments to everyday tools. AI is advancing so fast we are all struggling to maintain pace with major advances in robotics driving everyone’s imagination.

And in many countries, there is a more serious conversation about rebuilding maritime industrial capacity and resilience as a matter of national and economic security.

In other words, the conversations around climate and energy, technology and industrial competitiveness are no longer separate. They are all colliding in a new way, creating the latest inflection point.

Combining at this inflection point are data and digitalization, people and skills and partnerships and collaboration.

TECHNOLOGY

We have been talking about ‘going digital’ in shipping and shipbuilding for more than a decade, maybe longer. But unlike decarbonization, there is no single mandate, no fixed endstate and no moment when we can say, “We are done. We are digital.” Technology and technologists are the great advantage makers in our industry.

Ships themselves are becoming more software-defined, from the engine room to the bridge to the shore-based control center. And a noteworthy shift is also happening in shipyards.

In many facilities, we are now seeing the early architecture of what we might call the smart digital shipyard: a single digital thread running from concept design through basic and detail design into production, commissioning and then operations.

A production-grade 3D model does not just make for impressive visuals; it drives work instructions, training, workflow management and inspection—and now, in 2026—a rapid expansion of the discussion around automation and robotics, especially free-roaming robotics and humanoid ones in particular.

The same dataset that defines a structural member can later feed the digital twin that informs condition monitoring and maintenance. When you connect design, data and automation, a yard stops behaving like a one-off project shop and starts behaving more like a product company. It learns from each build. It updates its processes more quickly and it separates the learning from the work instructions.

PEOPLE AND SKILLS

By now, we’ve all seen some dire projections on the impact that AI will have on the workforce of the future. Don’t believe those. People are and always will be critical to our industry.

“Technology is only an advantage if you have the people who can design it, build it, operate it and continuously improve it.”

Technology is only an advantage if you have the people who can design it, build it, operate it and continuously improve it. In shipyards, that means welders who can program and supervise robots, not just weld manually.

It means production planners who can use AI to optimize plans and adjust digital twins and schedules when a supplier misses a delivery. It means naval architects and engineers who are comfortable collaborating with software developers and data scientists to build enhanced design tools that improve and speed their work.

Onboard and ashore, it means mariners who can run hybrid plants and advanced power management systems, not just conventional setups. Officers who can interpret decisionsupport tools and analytics, not just silence alarms. And shore-based teams who can manage fleets as systems, not just individual vessels.

Cyber awareness and digital literacy need to become part of basic seamanship and engineering competence. For existing mariners, this means a call for continuous learning and improvement. Not just reading some articles but getting into a classroom—physical or virtual—to get the proper depth of continuous learning they will need.

GLOBAL COOPERATION

Many maritime nations have long traditions of seafaring and strong training cultures. They have academies and training centers with deep experience in advanced vessel operation, integrated bridge systems and complex offshore and polar work.

At ABS, we see ourselves as a connector in this space. Our global footprint and relationships with owners, yards, regulators and academies give us both a vantage point and a responsibility to help bring the right people together. We intend to deepen that role, particularly as technologies like advanced robotics and autonomy move from theory into practice. These developments will demand a new blend of maritime and technological competence and the education system needs to be ready for that.

No single organization—no yard, owner, class society, government, or academy—can manage this transition alone.

The challenges are too complex, the technologies too diverse and the timelines too compressed. What we are seeing instead is the emergence of ecosystems. Yards are partnering with international shipbuilders, equipment manufacturers and automation suppliers to accelerate digital shipyard capabilities.

Owners are working with software companies, connectivity providers and data analysts to integrate fleet-wide digital solutions. Governments, regulators and classification societies are collaborating to turn emerging practices into clear rules, guidance and verification methods that enable innovation rather than blocking it.

CONCLUSION

We face real uncertainty around this point of inflection. The temptation is to wait, but we do not have to wait and in fact we cannot afford to. There are moves we can make right now that we will not regret.

We can invest in digital design and model-based engineering. We can pursue smart production and modularization in the yard. We can design vessels and fleets to be data-ready from the start, with meaningful digital twins as part of their DNA.

We can use operational analytics to improve efficiency, safety and emissions performance for the ships we already have. We can adopt targeted autonomy and advanced automation where they clearly add value, while maintaining a strong safety culture. And we can strengthen the pipeline of mariners and technologists by investing in maritime education at home and by embracing international cooperation.

If we do that, we move toward a more adaptive maritime system: yards that can reconfigure quickly and build complex vessels with confidence; fleets that can shift routes or roles with minimal friction; supply chains that are more visible and resilient; and people—mariners, engineers, technologists and educators—who are equipped to lead in a software-defined, data-driven industry.

The opportunity that technology presents is ours to grasp and in combination with the right skills and a mindset of collaboration, the industry is positioned to push performance past the next inflection point to higher levels of efficiency and safety.

The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.